On Jan 13, 10:16 am, "Ken S. Tucker" > wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2:49 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 11, 11:45 am, "Ken S. Tucker" > wrote:
> ...
> > > I was informed in the early 1970's a tanker of DDT
> > > spilled into the ocean could kill all life in Earth's
> > > oceans, now that's a cheap "doomsday weapon".
> > > The death is presumed to cascade to land animals.
> > > I have my doubts.
> > > Therefore, respecting science, I'm taking up a
> > > collection to perform this experiment, with the
> > > intent to disprove it.
> > > I think this is a chance for all good enviromentalist
> > > to come and contribute to our cause, to once and
> > > for all, dismiss that ill founded rumor.
> > > Regards
> > > Ken
>
> > LOL! HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERS KENNY!!!
>
> Hey there's a writers strike, I'm writing my own stuff.
> Apparently White house writers are on strike too,
> " we should have bombed Aushwitz to save lives".
> You know WW2 USAAF bombing accuracy, they
> would have dug a moat all around Aushwitz.
> Ken

Wife and I are arguing....
I figure "A bridge Too Far" + "Hogan's Heros's"
+ Patton + HH, then Battle of Bulge + HH.

She thinks we should drop the HH's and put in
"Bridge on the River Kwia", as a WW2 docu-drama.
Duh.....William Holden vs Bob Crane, Crane wins.

I'll respect reponses that support my side, to be fair.
Ken

On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> > > > wrote in news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> > > :
>
> > > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> > > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> > > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of everything NASA,
> > > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>
> > > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead loads of
> > > smut
> > > >> > crapolla?
>
> > > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially since thus
> > > far
> > > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of anything
> > > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> > > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together: "(Venus
> > > is
> > > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> > > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's hard at
> > > >> > work.
>
> > > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> > > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> > > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage units or
> > > > archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most everything in
> > > > sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
> > > > of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless
> > > > streams of their mission critical and science data. Gee whiz, no
> > > > wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get
> > > > away with it, just like it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY
> > > > fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
> > > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to
> > > > provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent
> > > > Muslims.
>
> > > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>
> > > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> > > Almost.
>
> > > Bertie
>
> > BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> > It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough or
> > hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
> > electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> > Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty, in
> > focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given in full
> > and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most everything
> > should. Guess our moon landings were simply too insignificant or
> > perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been informed.
> > - Brad Guth
>
> Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
> missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
> that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand
> on them.
>
> 6574178373
>

Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
spewing ass for all we care.

I believe it's called "put up or shut up".

- Brad Guth

On Jan 13, 12:36 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2:26 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
>
>
> > WingFlaps > wrote :
>
> > > On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
> > >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> > >> > > wrote in news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> > >> > :
>
> > >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> > >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> > >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of everything
> > >> > >> > NASA,
>
> > >> > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>
> > >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead loads
> > >> > >> > of
> > >> > smut
> > >> > >> > crapolla?
>
> > >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially since
> > >> > >> > thus
> > >> > far
> > >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
> > >> > >> > anything
>
> > >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> > >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
> > >> > >> > "(Venus
> > >> > is
> > >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> > >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
> > >> > >> > hard at
>
> > >> > >> > work.
>
> > >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> > >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> > >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage units
> > >> > > or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most
> > >> > > everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having
> > >> > > lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of
> > >> > > audio, video and endless streams of their mission critical and
> > >> > > science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so
> > >> > > continually lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like
> > >> > > it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
> > >> > > doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>
> > >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to
> > >> > > provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent
> > >> > > Muslims.
>
> > >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>
> > >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> > >> > Almost.
>
> > >> > Bertie
>
> > >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> > >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough or
> > >> hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
> > >> electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> > >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty, in
> > >> focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given in
> > >> full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
> > >> everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
> > >> insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
> > >> informed. - Brad Guth
>
> > > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
> > > missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
> > > that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand
> > > on them.
>
> > > 6574178373
>
> > Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>
> Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
> 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines (I
> can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the public
> domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen directly,
> the fact that these objects are where they should be seems to add a
> lot of credence to the idea that the missions took place. Add that to
> the photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
> conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray, you just
> have to look at it... I've carried out image processing on my moon
> pictures and the saturation of the colors is not zero but very close
> to it so you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
> gray surface..
>
> 6205987182

Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
resolution to start off with.

And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 13, 12:36 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>> On Jan 14, 2:26 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > WingFlaps > wrote
>> > innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-

>> > .com:
>>
>> > > On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
>> > >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> > >> > > wrote in
>> > >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> > >> > :
>>
>> > >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> > >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> > >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> > >> > >> > everything NASA,
>>
>> > >> > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>>
>> > >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
>> > >> > >> > loads of
>> > >> > smut
>> > >> > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> > >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially
>> > >> > >> > since thus
>> > >> > far
>> > >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf
>> > >> > >> > of anything
>>
>> > >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> > >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
>> > >> > >> > "(Venus
>> > >> > is
>> > >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> > >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
>> > >> > >> > that's hard at
>>
>> > >> > >> > work.
>>
>> > >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> > >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> > >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
>> > >> > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
>> > >> > > most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
>> > >> > > having lost track of all 700 of those essential
>> > >> > > NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless streams of
>> > >> > > their mission critical and science data. Gee whiz, no
>> > >> > > wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and
>> > >> > > manage to get away with it, just like it did for so long
>> > >> > > over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA
>> > >> > > flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>
>> > >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage
>> > >> > > to provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly
>> > >> > > innocent Muslims.
>>
>> > >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>>
>> > >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> > >> > Almost.
>>
>> > >> > Bertie
>>
>> > >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> > >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
>> > >> enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
>> > >> dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> > >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
>> > >> nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even
>> > >> if given in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish
>> > >> as most everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply
>> > >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've
>> > >> been informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> > > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed
>> > > byapollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
>> > > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
>> > > fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>
>> > > 6574178373
>>
>> > Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>
>> Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
>> 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines (I
>> can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the public
>> domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen directly,
>> the fact that these objects are where they should be seems to add a
>> lot of credence to the idea that the missions took place. Add that to
>> the photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
>> conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray, you just
>> have to look at it... I've carried out image processing on my moon
>> pictures and the saturation of the colors is not zero but very close
>> to it so you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
>> gray surface..
>>
>> 6205987182
>
> Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
> something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
> resolution to start off with.

Why? It's gaurunteed to not make the slightest bit of difference to your
"view" ( for want of a better word) so why should anyone bother?
>
> And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
> walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?

See? told you so. You haven;'t even seen it yet, fruitcake boi.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
>> On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> > > > wrote in
>> > > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> > > :
>>
>> > > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> > > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> > > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> > > >> > everything NASA,
>> > > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>>
>> > > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
>> > > >> > loads of
>> > > smut
>> > > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> > > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially since
>> > > >> > thus
>> > > far
>> > > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
>> > > >> > anything NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> > > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
>> > > >> > "(Venus
>> > > is
>> > > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> > > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
>> > > >> > hard at work.
>>
>> > > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> > > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> > > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
>> > > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most
>> > > > everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having
>> > > > lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of
>> > > > audio, video and endless streams of their mission critical and
>> > > > science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so
>> > > > continually lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like
>> > > > it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
>> > > > doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war that's going
>> > > > WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to provoke the
>> > > > living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent Muslims.
>>
>> > > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>>
>> > > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> > > Almost.
>>
>> > > Bertie
>>
>> > BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> > It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough
>> > or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
>> > electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> > Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
>> > in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
>> > in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
>> > everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
>> > insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
>> > informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
>> missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
>> that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not
>> expand on them.
>>
>> 6574178373
>>
>
> Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
> spewing ass for all we care.
>
> I believe it's called "put up or shut up



Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon and
got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still deny it.

It's because you're a k00k!

Bertie

On Jan 13, 1:16 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" > wrote:
>
> Hey there's a writers strike, I'm writing my own stuff.
No wonder your "stuff" sucks so hard.

Skip the writing - try chrome plating Q/C at a trailer hitch factory.

On Jan 13, 10:24 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> >> On Jan 10, 5:07 > wrote:
>
> >> > On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> > > wrote in
> >> > > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> > > :
>
> >> > > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> > > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> > > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> > > >> > everything NASA,
> >> > > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>
> >> > > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
> >> > > >> > loads of
> >> > > smut
> >> > > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> > > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially since
> >> > > >> > thus
> >> > > far
> >> > > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
> >> > > >> > anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> > > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
> >> > > >> > "(Venus
> >> > > is
> >> > > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> > > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
> >> > > >> > hard at work.
>
> >> > > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> > > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> > > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
> >> > > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most
> >> > > > everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having
> >> > > > lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of
> >> > > > audio, video and endless streams of their mission critical and
> >> > > > science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so
> >> > > > continually lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like
> >> > > > it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
> >> > > > doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war that's going
> >> > > > WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to provoke the
> >> > > > living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent Muslims.
>
> >> > > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>
> >> > > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> > > Almost.
>
> >> > > Bertie
>
> >> > BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> > It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough
> >> > or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
> >> > electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> > Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
> >> > in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
> >> > in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
> >> > everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
> >> > insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
> >> > informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
> >> missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
> >> that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not
> >> expand on them.
>
> >> 6574178373
>
> > Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
> > spewing ass for all we care.
>
> > I believe it's called "put up or shut up
>
> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon and
> got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still deny it.
>
> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> Bertie

But I just said that it would matter, because I wouldn't deny such
peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
physics.

Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
- Brad Guth

On Jan 13, 10:22 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> > Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
> > something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
> > resolution to start off with.
>
> Why? It's gaurunteed to not make the slightest bit of difference to your
> "view" ( for want of a better word) so why should anyone bother?
>
>
> > And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
> > walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?
>
> See? told you so. You haven;'t even seen it yet, fruitcake boi.
>
> Bertie

So, clearly you don't actually have that or any other such image to
share and share alike. Sounds like you're a born-again liar, just
like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in news:bd059b70-590d-49d2-a03f-
:

> On Jan 13, 10:22 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> > Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
>> > something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
>> > resolution to start off with.
>>
>> Why? It's gaurunteed to not make the slightest bit of difference to your
>> "view" ( for want of a better word) so why should anyone bother?
>>
>>
>> > And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
>> > walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?
>>
>> See? told you so. You haven;'t even seen it yet, fruitcake boi.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> So, clearly you don't actually have that or any other such image to
> share and share alike. Sounds like you're a born-again liar, just
> like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

You're talking to the wrong poster k00kie boi. I never claimed to have any
such image.



Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:



>>
>> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon
>> and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still
>> deny it.
>>
>> It's because you're a k00k!
>>
>> Bertie
>
> But I just said that it would matter,

No, you didn't. see above.



because I wouldn't deny such
> peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
> physics.

You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?

Nope.

On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon
> >> and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still
> >> deny it.
>
> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > But I just said that it would matter,
>
> No, you didn't. see above.
>
> because I wouldn't deny such
>
> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
> > physics.
>
> You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>
> Nope.

Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the sorts of
brown-nosed boys like yourself.

I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain you
feel the same way.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-

>> m:
>>
>>
>> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the
>> >> moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd
>> >> still deny it.
>>
>> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > But I just said that it would matter,
>>
>> No, you didn't. see above.
>>
>> because I wouldn't deny such
>>
>> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
>> > physics.
>>
>> You have a big future in creationism.....
>>
>> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>>
>> Nope.
>
> Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the sorts of
> brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>

Nope

> I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain you
> feel the same way.


Nope.

BradGuth wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >
> > > > > wrote in news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> > > > :
> >
> > > > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> > > > >> BradGuthwrote:
> >
> > > > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of everything NASA,
> > > > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
> >
> > > > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead loads of
> > > > smut
> > > > >> > crapolla?
> >
> > > > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially since thus
> > > > far
> > > > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of anything
> > > > >> > NASA/Apollo?
> >
> > > > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together: "(Venus
> > > > is
> > > > >> > ahoax.)"
> >
> > > > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's hard at
> > > > >> > work.
> >
> > > > >> > - Brad Guth
> >
> > > > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
> >
> > > > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage units or
> > > > > archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most everything in
> > > > > sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
> > > > > of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless
> > > > > streams of their mission critical and science data. Gee whiz, no
> > > > > wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get
> > > > > away with it, just like it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY
> > > > > fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
> > > > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to
> > > > > provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent
> > > > > Muslims.
> >
> > > > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
> >
> > > > Wow, that was almost coherent.
> >
> > > > Almost.
> >
> > > > Bertie
> >
> > > BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
> >
> > > It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough or
> > > hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
> > > electrostatic dusty moon.
> >
> > > Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty, in
> > > focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given in full
> > > and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most everything
> > > should. Guess our moon landings were simply too insignificant or
> > > perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been informed.
> > > - Brad Guth
> >
> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
> > missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
> > that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand
> > on them.
> >
> > 6574178373
> >
>
> Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
> spewing ass for all we care.
>
> I believe it's called "put up or shut up".
>

If I post them will you admit you are wrong?

Cheers

WingFlaps > wrote in
:

>
>
> BradGuth wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
>> > On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > wrote in
>> > > > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> > > > :
>> >
>> > > > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> > > > >> BradGuthwrote:
>> >
>> > > > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> > > > >> > everything NASA,
>> > > > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>> >
>> > > > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
>> > > > >> > loads of
>> > > > smut
>> > > > >> > crapolla?
>> >
>> > > > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially
>> > > > >> > since thus
>> > > > far
>> > > > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
>> > > > >> > anything NASA/Apollo?
>> >
>> > > > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
>> > > > >> > "(Venus
>> > > > is
>> > > > >> > ahoax.)"
>> >
>> > > > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
>> > > > >> > that's hard at work.
>> >
>> > > > >> > - Brad Guth
>> >
>> > > > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>> >
>> > > > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
>> > > > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
>> > > > > most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
>> > > > > having lost track of all 700 of those essential
>> > > > > NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless streams of their
>> > > > > mission critical and science data. Gee whiz, no
>> > > > > wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and manage
>> > > > > to get away with it, just like it did for so long over the
>> > > > > USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800,
>> > > > > 9/11 and the Iraq war that's going WWIII postal into Iran as
>> > > > > soon as we can manage to provoke the living crapolla out of
>> > > > > those other mostly innocent Muslims.
>> >
>> > > > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>> >
>> > > > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>> >
>> > > > Almost.
>> >
>> > > > Bertie
>> >
>> > > BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>> >
>> > > It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
>> > > enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
>> > > dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>> >
>> > > Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
>> > > in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
>> > > in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
>> > > everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
>> > > insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
>> > > informed. - Brad Guth
>> >
>> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
>> > missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope.
>> > But that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not
>> > expand on them.
>> >
>> > 6574178373
>> >
>>
>> Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
>> spewing ass for all we care.
>>
>> I believe it's called "put up or shut up".
>>
>
> If I post them will you admit you are wrong?
>

If there;s a wager going on this I'm going to bet, "no"


Bertie>

On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> m:
>
> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the
> >> >> moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd
> >> >> still deny it.
>
> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>
> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>
> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>
> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
> >> > physics.
>
> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>
> >> Nope.
>
> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the sorts of
> > brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>
> Nope
>
> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain you
> > feel the same way.
>
> Nope.

Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of course
it is)

What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much less
recorded on Kodak film?

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the
>> >> >> moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants,
>> >> >> you'd still deny it.
>>
>> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>>
>> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>>
>> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>>
>> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws
>> >> > of physics.
>>
>> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>>
>> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>>
>> >> Nope.
>>
>> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the sorts
>> > of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>>
>> Nope
>>
>> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain you
>> > feel the same way.
>>
>> Nope.
>
> Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of course
> it is)
>

You are't supposed to know that.

> What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much less
> recorded on Kodak film?

Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..

Bertie

On Jan 15, 4:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>
> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>
> >>
>
> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the
> >> >> >> moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants,
> >> >> >> you'd still deny it.
>
> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>
> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>
> >> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>
> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws
> >> >> > of physics.
>
> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>
> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the sorts
> >> > of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>
> >> Nope
>
> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain you
> >> > feel the same way.
>
> >> Nope.
>
> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of course
> > it is)
>
> You are't supposed to know that.
>
> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much less
> > recorded on Kodak film?
>
> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..

That figures. Fuji films never do show us blue worth any damn.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 15, 4:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:716a0ea2-0b6f-4536-b7b3-a8d199594a99
@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>>
>> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of
>> >> >> >> the moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander
>> >> >> >> remnants, you'd still deny it.
>>
>> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>>
>> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>>
>> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>>
>> >> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>>
>> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular
>> >> >> > laws of physics.
>>
>> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>>
>> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>>
>> >> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the
>> >> > sorts of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>>
>> >> Nope
>>
>> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain
>> >> > you feel the same way.
>>
>> >> Nope.
>>
>> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of
>> > course it is)
>>
>> You are't supposed to know that.
>>
>> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much
>> > less recorded on Kodak film?
>>
>> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..
>
> That figures. Fuji films never do show us blue worth any damn.=


So now yuo believe, do you?

My work here is done.

CIA always wins.


Bertie

On Jan 15, 7:18 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Jan 15, 4:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:716a0ea2-0b6f-4536-b7b3-a8d199594a99
>
> @s13g2000prd.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>
> >> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of
> >> >> >> >> the moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander
> >> >> >> >> remnants, you'd still deny it.
>
> >> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>
> >> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>
> >> >> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>
> >> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular
> >> >> >> > laws of physics.
>
> >> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> >> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>
> >> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the
> >> >> > sorts of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>
> >> >> Nope
>
> >> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain
> >> >> > you feel the same way.
>
> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of
> >> > course it is)
>
> >> You are't supposed to know that.
>
> >> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much
> >> > less recorded on Kodak film?
>
> >> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..
>
> > That figures. Fuji films never do show us blue worth any damn.=
>
> So now yuo believe, do you?
>
> My work here is done.
>
> CIA always wins.
>
> Bertie

That is true.

Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7787

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 15, 7:18 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:365b09af-5ab7-4a21-b431-

>> om:
>>
>> > On Jan 15, 4:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:716a0ea2-0b6f-4536-b7b3-a8d199594a99
>>
>> @s13g2000prd.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>>
>> >> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>>
>> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface
>> >> >> >> >> of the moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander
>> >> >> >> >> remnants, you'd still deny it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>>
>> >> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>>
>> >> >> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>>
>> >> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular
>> >> >> >> > laws of physics.
>>
>> >> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>>
>> >> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>>
>> >> >> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the
>> >> >> > sorts of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>>
>> >> >> Nope
>>
>> >> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm
>> >> >> > certain you feel the same way.
>>
>> >> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of
>> >> > course it is)
>>
>> >> You are't supposed to know that.
>>
>> >> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much
>> >> > less recorded on Kodak film?
>>
>> >> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..
>>
>> > That figures. Fuji films never do show us blue worth any damn.=
>>
>> So now yuo believe, do you?
>>
>> My work here is done.
>>
>> CIA always wins.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> That is true.

Give up before we destroy you.


Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>> > wrote
>>>
>[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>>
>> That is true.
>
>Give up before we destroy you.
>
>Bertie
You must be kidding me to continue participating in this troll's efforts.


A very successful effort by this character.

As you can see by now he really doesn't believe this stuff anyway but is
getting entertained by the attention.

Bertie, for the love of all things... move on to more worthy trolls.

You are a hoot.

Lets go play with someone else now, k?

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200801/1

On Jan 16, 1:48*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>
> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>
> >>
>
> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the
> >> >> >> moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants,
> >> >> >> you'd still deny it.
>
> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>
> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>
> >> >> *because I wouldn't deny such
>
> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws
> >> >> > of physics.
>
> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>
> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the sorts
> >> > of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>
> >> Nope
>
> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm certain you
> >> > feel the same way.
>
> >> Nope.
>
> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of course
> > it is)
>
> You *are't supposed to know that.
>
> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much less
> > recorded on Kodak film?
>
> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..
>

The blue moon will only be seen when there is just one person left
standing!

Cheers

On Jan 15, 6:12*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote :
>
>
>
>
>
> > BradGuth wrote:
> >> On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
>
> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > wrote in
> >> > > > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> > > > :
>
> >> > > > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> > > > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> > > > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> > > > >> > everything NASA,
> >> > > > >> >Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?
>
> >> > > > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
> >> > > > >> > loads of
> >> > > > smut
> >> > > > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> > > > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially
> >> > > > >> > since thus
> >> > > > far
> >> > > > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
> >> > > > >> > anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> > > > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
> >> > > > >> > "(Venus
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> > > > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
> >> > > > >> > that's hard at work.
>
> >> > > > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> > > > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> > > > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
> >> > > > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
> >> > > > > most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
> >> > > > > having lost track of all 700 of those essential
> >> > > > > NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless streams of their
> >> > > > > mission critical and science data. * Gee whiz, no
> >> > > > > wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and manage
> >> > > > > to get away with it, just like it did for so long over the
> >> > > > > USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800,
> >> > > > > 9/11 and the Iraq war that's going WWIII postal into Iran as
> >> > > > > soon as we can manage to provoke the living crapolla out of
> >> > > > > those other mostly innocent Muslims.
>
> >> > > > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>
> >> > > > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> > > > Almost.
>
> >> > > > Bertie
>
> >> > > BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> > > It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
> >> > > enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
> >> > > dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> > > Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
> >> > > in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
> >> > > in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
> >> > > everything should. *Guess our moon landings were simply too
> >> > > insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
> >> > > informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
> >> > missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope.
> >> > But that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not
> >> > expand on them.
>
> >> > 6574178373
>
> >> Please do expand away. *Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
> >> spewing ass for all we care.
>
> >> I believe it's called "put up or shut up".
>
> > If I post them will you admit you are wrong?
>
> If there;s a wager going on this I'm going to bet, "no"
>

His lack of response is deafening.

76763223

Time to tighten the drag?

Cheers

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in news:7e41d793ff6ce@uwe:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>>>> > wrote
>>>>
>>[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>>>
>>> That is true.
>>
>>Give up before we destroy you.
>>
>>Bertie
> You must be kidding me to continue participating in this troll's efforts.
>
>
> A very successful effort by this character.
>
> As you can see by now he really doesn't believe this stuff anyway but is
> getting entertained by the attention.


Mmm, maybe.
>
> Bertie, for the love of all things... move on to more worthy trolls.
>
> You are a hoot.
>
> Lets go play with someone else now, k?
>

Ah, it's like playing solitaire



Bertie

On Jan 15, 10:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Jan 15, 7:18 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:365b09af-5ab7-4a21-b431-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Jan 15, 4:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:716a0ea2-0b6f-4536-b7b3-a8d199594a99
>
> >> @s13g2000prd.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>
> >> >> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>
> >> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface
> >> >> >> >> >> of the moon and got to lick the hull of one of the lander
> >> >> >> >> >> remnants, you'd still deny it.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>
> >> >> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>
> >> >> >> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>
> >> >> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular
> >> >> >> >> > laws of physics.
>
> >> >> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>
> >> >> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>
> >> >> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> >> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for the
> >> >> >> > sorts of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>
> >> >> >> Nope
>
> >> >> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm
> >> >> >> > certain you feel the same way.
>
> >> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> >> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of
> >> >> > course it is)
>
> >> >> You are't supposed to know that.
>
> >> >> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or much
> >> >> > less recorded on Kodak film?
>
> >> >> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..
>
> >> > That figures. Fuji films never do show us blue worth any damn.=
>
> >> So now yuo believe, do you?
>
> >> My work here is done.
>
> >> CIA always wins.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > That is true.
>
> Give up before we destroy you.

You no like: Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7787

- Brad Guth

On Jan 15, 10:25 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote innews:7e41d793ff6ce@uwe:
>
>
>
> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> > wrote
> >>>>
> >>[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>
> >>> That is true.
>
> >>Give up before we destroy you.
>
> >>Bertie
> > You must be kidding me to continue participating in this troll's efforts.
>
> > A very successful effort by this character.
>
> > As you can see by now he really doesn't believe this stuff anyway but is
> > getting entertained by the attention.
>
> Mmm, maybe.
>
>
>
> > Bertie, for the love of all things... move on to more worthy trolls.
>
> > You are a hoot.
>
> > Lets go play with someone else now, k?
>
> Ah, it's like playing solitaire
>
> Bertie

You folks of the mostly Semitic brown-nosed kind don't like playing
your own MI5/CIA game of global ****ology?

Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7787

If not about that blue moon as recorded by China and Japan, would you
much rather talk USS Liberty, JFK, ABL/Columbia or, how about those
silly laws of physics as pertaining to TWA flight 800 and of what else
was in the air and on the sea besides our pollution?
..
- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
>> > wrote

>
>You folks of the mostly Semitic brown-nosed kind don't like playing
>your own MI5/CIA game of global ****ology?
>
>.
>- Brad Guth

Jeezuz the cat has been reduced to babbling poo.

take care fella.

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200801/1

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 15, 10:25 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote
>> innews:7e41d793ff6ce@uwe:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >>>> innews:365b09af-5ab7-4a21-b431-

>> >>>> ups.c
>> >>[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>>
>> >>> That is true.
>>
>> >>Give up before we destroy you.
>>
>> >>Bertie
>> > You must be kidding me to continue participating in this troll's
>> > efforts.
>>
>> > A very successful effort by this character.
>>
>> > As you can see by now he really doesn't believe this stuff anyway
>> > but is getting entertained by the attention.
>>
>> Mmm, maybe.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Bertie, for the love of all things... move on to more worthy
>> > trolls.
>>
>> > You are a hoot.
>>
>> > Lets go play with someone else now, k?
>>
>> Ah, it's like playing solitaire
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You folks of the mostly Semitic brown-nosed kind don't like playing
> your own MI5/CIA game of global ****ology?
>
> Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida
> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7787
>
> If not about that blue moon as recorded by China and Japan, would you
> much rather talk USS Liberty, JFK, ABL/Columbia or, how about those
> silly laws of physics as pertaining to TWA flight 800 and of what else
> was in the air and on the sea besides our pollution?

Youo're a busy boi aintcha?

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Jan 15, 10:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:69b211ac-7b97-42e2-968e-

>> om:
>>
>> > On Jan 15, 7:18 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:365b09af-5ab7-4a21-b431-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Jan 15, 4:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:716a0ea2-0b6f-4536-b7b3-a8d199594a99
>>
>> >> @s13g2000prd.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 14, 5:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:800ab53b-bec9-4e44-ae70-64acea2361a3
>>
>> >> >> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Jan 14, 4:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> innews:6083e36f-e40f-4526-aab7-
>>
>> >> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the
>> >> >> >> >> >> surface of the moon and got to lick the hull of one of
>> >> >> >> >> >> the lander remnants, you'd still deny it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It's because you're a k00k!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > But I just said that it would matter,
>>
>> >> >> >> >> No, you didn't. see above.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> because I wouldn't deny such
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > peer replicated science as based upon those pesky
>> >> >> >> >> > regular laws of physics.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> You have a big future in creationism.....
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Good to hear, because uncle Hitler is always looking for
>> >> >> >> > the sorts of brown-nosed boys like yourself.
>>
>> >> >> >> Nope
>>
>> >> >> >> > I can't help those past the point of no return, as I'm
>> >> >> >> > certain you feel the same way.
>>
>> >> >> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> >> > Is that your best MI5/CIA code speak? (don't be silly, why of
>> >> >> > course it is)
>>
>> >> >> You are't supposed to know that.
>>
>> >> >> > What about our BLUE moon that your NASA/Apollo never saw or
>> >> >> > much less recorded on Kodak film?
>>
>> >> >> Ah, now you're getting closer to the secret. It was Fuji..
>>
>> >> > That figures. Fuji films never do show us blue worth any damn.=
>>
>> >> So now yuo believe, do you?
>>
>> >> My work here is done.
>>
>> >> CIA always wins.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > That is true.
>>
>> Give up before we destroy you.
>
> You no like: Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida


Oow, keep that sort of thing up and we're going to have to stop druggin
your quaker oats


Bertie

On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
> > :
>
> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > wrote in
> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>
> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they can?
>
> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
> >> >> > >> > loads of
> >> >> > smut
> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially
> >> >> > >> > since thus
> >> >> > far
> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
> >> >> > >> > anything
>
> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
> >> >> > >> > "(Venus
> >> >> > is
> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
> >> >> > >> > hard at
>
> >> >> > >> > work.
>
> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
> >> >> > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
> >> >> > > most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
> >> >> > > having lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apollo
> >> >> > > boxes of audio, video and endless streams of their mission
> >> >> > > critical and science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our
> >> >> > > government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get away
> >> >> > > with it, just like it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY
> >> >> > > fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the
> >> >> > > Iraq war
>
> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage
> >> >> > > to provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly
> >> >> > > innocent Muslims.
>
> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>
> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> >> > Almost.
>
> >> >> > Bertie
>
> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough
> >> >> or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
> >> >> electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
> >> >> in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
> >> >> in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
> >> >> everything should. *Guess our moon landings were simply too
> >> >> insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
> >> >> informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
> >> > apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
> >> > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy
> >> > so I'll not expand on them.
>
> >> > 6574178373
>
> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>
> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
> > 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines (I
> > can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the public
> > domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen directly,
> > the fact that these objects are where they should be seems to add a
> > lot of credence to the idea that the missions took place. Add that to
> > the photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
> > conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray, you just
> > have to look at it... *I've carried out image processing on my moon
> > pictures and the saturation of the colors is not zero but very close
> > to it so you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
> > gray surface..
>
> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>
> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings. What
> they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I haven't got the
> patience to address the same BS issues like the shadows, the gamma
> radiation the breeze in the flag and all that. it doesn't matter to them
> how well you explain it, they keep coming back for more.
>

Hey Bertie what do you think about this:

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15_touchdown_photos_010427.html

Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a flounder's
brain explode or will it implode?

36796808

Cheers

WingFlaps > wrote in
:

> On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> WingFlaps > wrote
>> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
> :
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
>> > :
>>
>> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
>> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > wrote in
>> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>>
>> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they
>> >> >> > >> > can?
>>
>> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
>> >> >> > >> > loads of
>> >> >> > smut
>> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially
>> >> >> > >> > since thus
>> >> >> > far
>> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf
>> >> >> > >> > of anything
>>
>> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
>> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
>> >> >> > is
>> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
>> >> >> > >> > that's hard at
>>
>> >> >> > >> > work.
>>
>> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
>> >> >> > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
>> >> >> > > most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
>> >> >> > > having lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apollo
>> >> >> > > boxes of audio, video and endless streams of their mission
>> >> >> > > critical and science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our
>> >> >> > > government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get
>> >> >> > > away with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
>> >> >> > > LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800,
>> >> >> > > 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>
>> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
>> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those other
>> >> >> > > mostly innocent Muslims.
>>
>> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>>
>> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> >> >> > Almost.
>>
>> >> >> > Bertie
>>
>> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
>> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
>> >> >> enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
>> >> >> dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
>> >> >> nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even
>> >> >> if given in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish
>> >> >> as most everything should. *Guess our moon landings were simply
>> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've
>> >> >> been informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
>> >> > apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
>> >> > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
>> >> > fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>
>> >> > 6574178373
>>
>> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>
>> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
>> > 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines
>> > (I can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the
>> > public domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen
>> > directly, the fact that these objects are where they should be
>> > seems to add a lot of credence to the idea that the missions took
>> > place. Add that to the photographs and samples and it's not looking
>> > good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly
>> > gray, you just have to look at it... *I've carried out image
>> > processing on my moon pictures and the saturation of the colors is
>> > not zero but very close to it so you have to boost color contrast a
>> > lot to see hues in the gray surface..
>>
>> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>>
>> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings.
>> What they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I haven't
>> got the patience to address the same BS issues like the shadows, the
>> gamma radiation the breeze in the flag and all that. it doesn't
>> matter to them how well you explain it, they keep coming back for
>> more.
>>
>
> Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>
> http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
_touchdown_photos
> _010427.html
>
> Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a flounder's
> brain explode or will it implode?
>
That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.

Bertie

On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
> > :
>
> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
> >> > :
>
> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > wrote in
> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>
> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they
> >> >> >> > >> > can?
>
> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
> >> >> >> > >> > loads of
> >> >> >> > smut
> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about, especially
> >> >> >> > >> > since thus
> >> >> >> > far
> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf
> >> >> >> > >> > of anything
>
> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
> >> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
> >> >> >> > >> > that's hard at
>
> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>
> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
> >> >> >> > > units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
> >> >> >> > > most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
> >> >> >> > > having lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apollo
> >> >> >> > > boxes of audio, video and endless streams of their mission
> >> >> >> > > critical and science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our
> >> >> >> > > government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get
> >> >> >> > > away with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
> >> >> >> > > LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800,
> >> >> >> > > 9/11 and the Iraq war
>
> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those other
> >> >> >> > > mostly innocent Muslims.
>
> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.
>
> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> >> >> > Almost.
>
> >> >> >> > Bertie
>
> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
> >> >> >> enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
> >> >> >> dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
> >> >> >> nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even
> >> >> >> if given in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish
> >> >> >> as most everything should. *Guess our moon landings were simply
> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've
> >> >> >> been informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
> >> >> > apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
> >> >> > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
> >> >> > fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>
> >> >> > 6574178373
>
> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>
> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
> >> > 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines
> >> > (I can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the
> >> > public domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen
> >> > directly, the fact that these objects are where they should be
> >> > seems to add a lot of credence to the idea that the missions took
> >> > place. Add that to the photographs and samples and it's not looking
> >> > good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly
> >> > gray, you just have to look at it... *I've carried out image
> >> > processing on my moon pictures and the saturation of the colors is
> >> > not zero but very close to it so you have to boost color contrast a
> >> > lot to see hues in the gray surface..
>
> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>
> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings.
> >> What they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I haven't
> >> got the patience to address the same BS issues like the shadows, the
> >> gamma radiation the breeze in the flag and all that. it doesn't
> >> matter to them how well you explain it, they keep coming back for
> >> more.
>
> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>
> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
> _touchdown_photos
> > _010427.html
>
> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a flounder's
> > brain explode or will it implode?
>
> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>

Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P

Cheers

WingFlaps > wrote in
:

> On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> WingFlaps > wrote
>> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
> :
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
>> > :
>>
>> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
>> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > > wrote in
>> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> >> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they
>> >> >> >> > >> > can?
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
>> >> >> >> > >> > instead loads of
>> >> >> >> > smut
>> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
>> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
>> >> >> >> > far
>> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
>> >> >> >> > >> > behalf of anything
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
>> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
>> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
>> >> >> >> > >> > that's hard at
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
>> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
>> >> >> >> > > recording upon most everything in sight or out of sight,
>> >> >> >> > > yet somehow their having lost track of all 700 of those
>> >> >> >> > > essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video and endless
>> >> >> >> > > streams of their mission critical and science data. *
>> >> >> >> > > Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so continually
>> >> >> >> > > lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like it
>> >> >> >> > > did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is
>> >> >> >> > > still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>
>> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
>> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those other
>> >> >> >> > > mostly innocent Muslims.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
>> >> >> >> > > shame.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Almost.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
>> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
>> >> >> >> enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
>> >> >> >> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
>> >> >> >> nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything,
>> >> >> >> even if given in full and uncorrected color looking as
>> >> >> >> though bluish as most everything should. *Guess our moon
>> >> >> >> landings were simply
>
>> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
>> >> >> >> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
>> >> >> > apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
>> >> >> > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
>> >> >> > fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>
>> >> >> > 6574178373
>>
>> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>
>> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
>> >> > dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander
>> >> > engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is
>> >> > in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to
>> >> > be seen directly, the fact that these objects are where they
>> >> > should be seems to add a lot of credence to the idea that the
>> >> > missions took place. Add that to the photographs and samples and
>> >> > it's not looking good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the
>> >> > moon not being mostly gray, you just have to look at it... *I've
>> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
>> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so you
>> >> > have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the gray
>> >> > surface..
>>
>> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>>
>> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings.
>> >> What they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I
>> >> haven't got the patience to address the same BS issues like the
>> >> shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the flag and all that.
>> >> it doesn't matter to them how well you explain it, they keep
>> >> coming back for more.
>>
>> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>>
>> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
>> _touchdown_photos
>> > _010427.html
>>
>> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
>> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>>
>> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>>
>
> Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>
> Cheers
>
>

Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?

Bertie

On Jan 16, 3:41*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
> > :
>
> >> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
> >> > :
>
> >> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> >> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they
> >> >> >> >> > >> > can?
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
> >> >> >> >> > >> > instead loads of
> >> >> >> >> > smut
> >> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
> >> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
> >> >> >> >> > far
> >> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
> >> >> >> >> > >> > behalf of anything
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
> >> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
> >> >> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
> >> >> >> >> > >> > that's hard at
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
> >> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
> >> >> >> >> > > recording upon most everything in sight or out of sight,
> >> >> >> >> > > yet somehow their having lost track of all 700 of those
> >> >> >> >> > > essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video and endless
> >> >> >> >> > > streams of their mission critical and science data. *
> >> >> >> >> > > Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so continually
> >> >> >> >> > > lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like it
> >> >> >> >> > > did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is
> >> >> >> >> > > still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>
> >> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
> >> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those other
> >> >> >> >> > > mostly innocent Muslims.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
> >> >> >> >> > > shame.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Almost.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
> >> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
> >> >> >> >> enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
> >> >> >> >> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
> >> >> >> >> nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything,
> >> >> >> >> even if given in full and uncorrected color looking as
> >> >> >> >> though bluish as most everything should. *Guess our moon
> >> >> >> >> landings were simply
>
> >> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
> >> >> >> >> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
> >> >> >> > apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
> >> >> >> > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
> >> >> >> > fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>
> >> >> >> > 6574178373
>
> >> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>
> >> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
> >> >> > dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander
> >> >> > engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is
> >> >> > in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to
> >> >> > be seen directly, the fact that these objects are where they
> >> >> > should be seems to add a lot of credence to the idea that the
> >> >> > missions took place. Add that to the photographs and samples and
> >> >> > it's not looking good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the
> >> >> > moon not being mostly gray, you just have to look at it... *I've
> >> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
> >> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so you
> >> >> > have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the gray
> >> >> > surface..
>
> >> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>
> >> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings.
> >> >> What they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I
> >> >> haven't got the patience to address the same BS issues like the
> >> >> shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the flag and all that.
> >> >> it doesn't matter to them how well you explain it, they keep
> >> >> coming back for more.
>
> >> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>
> >> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
> >> _touchdown_photos
> >> > _010427.html
>
> >> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
> >> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>
> >> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>
> > Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>
> > Cheers
>
> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>

I have now. Remind you of anyone?

http://cgi.ebay.com/Barbie-Mariposa-KEN-as-Butterfly-Fairy-Prince-Gay_W0QQitemZ230212460082QQihZ013QQcategoryZ15962Q QssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

I hold you entirely responsible for bringing this perversion to my
attention.

911666999

Cheers

On Jan 16, 3:41*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
> > :
>
> >> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
> >> > :
>
> >> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> >> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as they
> >> >> >> >> > >> > can?
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
> >> >> >> >> > >> > instead loads of
> >> >> >> >> > smut
> >> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
> >> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
> >> >> >> >> > far
> >> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
> >> >> >> >> > >> > behalf of anything
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
> >> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
> >> >> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
> >> >> >> >> > >> > that's hard at
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
> >> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
> >> >> >> >> > > recording upon most everything in sight or out of sight,
> >> >> >> >> > > yet somehow their having lost track of all 700 of those
> >> >> >> >> > > essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video and endless
> >> >> >> >> > > streams of their mission critical and science data. *
> >> >> >> >> > > Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so continually
> >> >> >> >> > > lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like it
> >> >> >> >> > > did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is
> >> >> >> >> > > still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>
> >> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
> >> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those other
> >> >> >> >> > > mostly innocent Muslims.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
> >> >> >> >> > > shame.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Almost.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
> >> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
> >> >> >> >> enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
> >> >> >> >> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
> >> >> >> >> nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything,
> >> >> >> >> even if given in full and uncorrected color looking as
> >> >> >> >> though bluish as most everything should. *Guess our moon
> >> >> >> >> landings were simply
>
> >> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
> >> >> >> >> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed by
> >> >> >> > apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
> >> >> >> > telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
> >> >> >> > fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>
> >> >> >> > 6574178373
>
> >> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>
> >> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
> >> >> > dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander
> >> >> > engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is
> >> >> > in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to
> >> >> > be seen directly, the fact that these objects are where they
> >> >> > should be seems to add a lot of credence to the idea that the
> >> >> > missions took place. Add that to the photographs and samples and
> >> >> > it's not looking good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the
> >> >> > moon not being mostly gray, you just have to look at it... *I've
> >> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
> >> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so you
> >> >> > have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the gray
> >> >> > surface..
>
> >> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>
> >> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar landings.
> >> >> What they did is easier than a cover up would be anyway... I
> >> >> haven't got the patience to address the same BS issues like the
> >> >> shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the flag and all that.
> >> >> it doesn't matter to them how well you explain it, they keep
> >> >> coming back for more.
>
> >> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>
> >> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
> >> _touchdown_photos
> >> > _010427.html
>
> >> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
> >> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>
> >> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>
> > Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>
> > Cheers
>
> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>

Well I looked for you and guess what, I had no idea they had made a
DVD about you: "The naked bunyip" Described as "The first serious
study of sex in Australia".

The best thing is there's no sex in it...

LOL

Cheers



survey

WingFlaps > wrote in
:

> On Jan 16, 3:41*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> WingFlaps > wrote
>> innews:0948547e-acea-4531-bd59-345e8
> :
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
>> > :
>>
>> >> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
>> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
>> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> >> >> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > they can?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > instead loads of
>> >> >> >> >> > smut
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
>> >> >> >> >> > far
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > behalf of anything
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
>> >> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > ****ology that's hard at
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
>> >> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
>> >> >> >> >> > > recording upon most everything in sight or out of
>> >> >> >> >> > > sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
>> >> >> >> >> > > of those essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video
>> >> >> >> >> > > and endless streams of their mission critical and
>> >> >> >> >> > > science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our government
>> >> >> >> >> > > can so continually lie, deny and manage to get away
>> >> >> >> >> > > with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
>> >> >> >> >> > > LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight
>> >> >> >> >> > > 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
>> >> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those
>> >> >> >> >> > > other mostly innocent Muslims.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
>> >> >> >> >> > > shame.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Almost.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
>> >> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough,
>> >> >> >> >> bright enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
>> >> >> >> >> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually
>> >> >> >> >> rather nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of
>> >> >> >> >> anything, even if given in full and uncorrected color
>> >> >> >> >> looking as though bluish as most everything should.
>> >> >> >> >> *Guess our moon landings were simply
>>
>> >> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
>> >> >> >> >> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed
>> >> >> >> > by apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by
>> >> >> >> > orbiting telescope. But that would get in the way of you
>> >> >> >> > conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>
>> >> >> >> > 6574178373
>>
>> >> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>
>> >> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
>> >> >> > dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the
>> >> >> > lander engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the
>> >> >> > picture is in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are)
>> >> >> > too small to be seen directly, the fact that these objects
>> >> >> > are where they should be seems to add a lot of credence to
>> >> >> > the idea that the missions took place. Add that to the
>> >> >> > photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
>> >> >> > conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray,
>> >> >> > you just have to look at it... *I've
>
>> >> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
>> >> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so
>> >> >> > you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
>> >> >> > gray surface..
>>
>> >> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>>
>> >> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar
>> >> >> landings. What they did is easier than a cover up would be
>> >> >> anyway... I haven't got the patience to address the same BS
>> >> >> issues like the shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the
>> >> >> flag and all that. it doesn't matter to them how well you
>> >> >> explain it, they keep coming back for more.
>>
>> >> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>>
>> >> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
>> >> _touchdown_photos
>> >> > _010427.html
>>
>> >> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
>> >> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>>
>> >> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>>
>> > Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>>
>> > Cheers
>>
>> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>>
>
> I have now. Remind you of anyone?
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/Barbie-Mariposa-KEN-as-Butterfly-Fairy-Prince-
Gay_W
> 0QQitemZ230212460082QQihZ013QQcategoryZ15962QQssPa geNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQc
m
> dZViewItem
>
> I hold you entirely responsible for bringing this perversion to my
> attentio

Moi? WTF were you searching for to find that?

Bertie

WingFlaps > wrote in
:

> On Jan 16, 3:41*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> WingFlaps > wrote
>> innews:0948547e-acea-4531-bd59-345e8
> :
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
>> > :
>>
>> >> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
>> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
>> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> >> >> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > they can?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > instead loads of
>> >> >> >> >> > smut
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
>> >> >> >> >> > far
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > behalf of anything
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
>> >> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > ****ology that's hard at
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
>> >> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
>> >> >> >> >> > > recording upon most everything in sight or out of
>> >> >> >> >> > > sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
>> >> >> >> >> > > of those essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video
>> >> >> >> >> > > and endless streams of their mission critical and
>> >> >> >> >> > > science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our government
>> >> >> >> >> > > can so continually lie, deny and manage to get away
>> >> >> >> >> > > with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
>> >> >> >> >> > > LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight
>> >> >> >> >> > > 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
>> >> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those
>> >> >> >> >> > > other mostly innocent Muslims.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
>> >> >> >> >> > > shame.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Almost.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
>> >> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough,
>> >> >> >> >> bright enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
>> >> >> >> >> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually
>> >> >> >> >> rather nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of
>> >> >> >> >> anything, even if given in full and uncorrected color
>> >> >> >> >> looking as though bluish as most everything should.
>> >> >> >> >> *Guess our moon landings were simply
>>
>> >> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
>> >> >> >> >> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed
>> >> >> >> > by apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by
>> >> >> >> > orbiting telescope. But that would get in the way of you
>> >> >> >> > conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>
>> >> >> >> > 6574178373
>>
>> >> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>
>> >> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
>> >> >> > dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the
>> >> >> > lander engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the
>> >> >> > picture is in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are)
>> >> >> > too small to be seen directly, the fact that these objects
>> >> >> > are where they should be seems to add a lot of credence to
>> >> >> > the idea that the missions took place. Add that to the
>> >> >> > photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
>> >> >> > conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray,
>> >> >> > you just have to look at it... *I've
>
>> >> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
>> >> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so
>> >> >> > you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
>> >> >> > gray surface..
>>
>> >> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>>
>> >> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar
>> >> >> landings. What they did is easier than a cover up would be
>> >> >> anyway... I haven't got the patience to address the same BS
>> >> >> issues like the shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the
>> >> >> flag and all that. it doesn't matter to them how well you
>> >> >> explain it, they keep coming back for more.
>>
>> >> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>>
>> >> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
>> >> _touchdown_photos
>> >> > _010427.html
>>
>> >> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
>> >> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>>
>> >> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>>
>> > Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>>
>> > Cheers
>>
>> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>>
>
> Well I looked for you and guess what, I had no idea they had made a
> DVD about you: "The naked bunyip" Described as "The first serious
> study of sex in Australia".
>
> The best thing is there's no sex in it...
>


Are you serious?

In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
yourself Sheila"


Bertie

Hi,

In article >,
Bertie the > wrote:
> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
> yourself Sheila"

No, that's foreplay...

Andy

Andy Hawkins > wrote in
:

> Hi,
>
> In article >,
> Bertie the > wrote:
>> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
>> yourself Sheila"
>
> No, that's foreplay...
>

Doh!

Bertie

"Andy Hawkins" wrote
>Bertie the > wrote:
>> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
>> yourself Sheila"
>
> No, that's foreplay...

Ahh, that used to be the case. Ozzie blokes are a lot more sophisticated
now, and foreplay now consists of "Are you awake love?".

Btw, either answer from the sheila will get the same response ......

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote in
> :
>
>> On Jan 16, 3:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>> WingFlaps > wrote
>>> innews:0948547e-acea-4531-bd59-345e8
>> :
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jan 16, 2:50 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>> WingFlaps > wrote
>>>>> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
>>>> :
>>>>>> On Jan 14, 9:46 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>>>> WingFlaps > wrote
>>>>>>> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> On Jan 14, 2:26 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> WingFlaps > wrote
>>>>>>>>> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BradGuthwrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything NASA,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead loads of
>>>>>>>>>>>> smut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crapolla?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a little something to worry about,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially since thus
>>>>>>>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behalf of anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NASA/Apollo?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together: "(Venus
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ahoax.)"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ****ology that's hard at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Brad Guth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
>>>>>>>>>>>>> storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> recording upon most everything in sight or out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of those essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and endless streams of their mission critical and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can so continually lie, deny and manage to get away
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other mostly innocent Muslims.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shame.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Almost.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bertie
>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
>>>>>>>>>>> NASA/Apollo?
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough,
>>>>>>>>>>> bright enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
>>>>>>>>>>> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>>>>>>>>>> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually
>>>>>>>>>>> rather nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of
>>>>>>>>>>> anything, even if given in full and uncorrected color
>>>>>>>>>>> looking as though bluish as most everything should.
>>>>>>>>>>> Guess our moon landings were simply
>>>>>>>>>>> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
>>>>>>>>>>> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>>>>>>>>>> Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed
>>>>>>>>>> by apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by
>>>>>>>>>> orbiting telescope. But that would get in the way of you
>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>>>>>>>>> 6574178373
>>>>>>>>> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>>>>>>> Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
>>>>>>>> dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the
>>>>>>>> lander engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the
>>>>>>>> picture is in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are)
>>>>>>>> too small to be seen directly, the fact that these objects
>>>>>>>> are where they should be seems to add a lot of credence to
>>>>>>>> the idea that the missions took place. Add that to the
>>>>>>>> photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
>>>>>>>> conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray,
>>>>>>>> you just have to look at it... I've
>>>>>>>> carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
>>>>>>>> saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so
>>>>>>>> you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
>>>>>>>> gray surface..
>>>>>>> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>>>>>>> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar
>>>>>>> landings. What they did is easier than a cover up would be
>>>>>>> anyway... I haven't got the patience to address the same BS
>>>>>>> issues like the shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the
>>>>>>> flag and all that. it doesn't matter to them how well you
>>>>>>> explain it, they keep coming back for more.
>>>>>> Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>>>>>> http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
>>>>> _touchdown_photos
>>>>>> _010427.html
>>>>>> Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
>>>>>> flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>>>>> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>>>> Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>>>> Cheers
>>> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>>>
>> Well I looked for you and guess what, I had no idea they had made a
>> DVD about you: "The naked bunyip" Described as "The first serious
>> study of sex in Australia".
>>
>> The best thing is there's no sex in it...
>>
>
>
> Are you serious?
>
> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
> yourself Sheila"

Nah, it was "This One's for Ewe."

Rich Ahrens > wrote in news:47902340$0$27497
:
>>
>> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
>> yourself Sheila"
>
> Nah, it was "This One's for Ewe."
>

Nah, thats the Kiwis!


Bertie

On Jan 17, 3:53*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> WingFlaps > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 3:41*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> innews:0948547e-acea-4531-bd59-345e8
> > :
>
> >> > On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
> >> > :
>
> >> >> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
> >> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
> >> >> >> >> >> > :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > everything NASA,
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > they can?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > instead loads of
> >> >> >> >> >> > smut
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
> >> >> >> >> >> > far
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > behalf of anything
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
> >> >> >> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > ****ology that's hard at
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
> >> >> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying and
> >> >> >> >> >> > > recording upon most everything in sight or out of
> >> >> >> >> >> > > sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
> >> >> >> >> >> > > of those essential NASA/Apollo boxes of audio, video
> >> >> >> >> >> > > and endless streams of their mission critical and
> >> >> >> >> >> > > science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder our government
> >> >> >> >> >> > > can so continually lie, deny and manage to get away
> >> >> >> >> >> > > with it, just like it did for so long over the USS
> >> >> >> >> >> > > LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight
> >> >> >> >> >> > > 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can
> >> >> >> >> >> > > manage to provoke the living crapolla out of those
> >> >> >> >> >> > > other mostly innocent Muslims.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
> >> >> >> >> >> > > shame.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Almost.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
> >> >> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough,
> >> >> >> >> >> bright enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that
> >> >> >> >> >> physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually
> >> >> >> >> >> rather nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of
> >> >> >> >> >> anything, even if given in full and uncorrected color
> >> >> >> >> >> looking as though bluish as most everything should.
> >> >> >> >> >> *Guess our moon landings were simply
>
> >> >> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent
> >> >> >> >> >> we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed
> >> >> >> >> > by apollo missions that can be detected on earth or by
> >> >> >> >> > orbiting telescope. But that would get in the way of you
> >> >> >> >> > conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>
> >> >> >> >> > 6574178373
>
> >> >> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>
> >> >> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a
> >> >> >> > dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the
> >> >> >> > lander engines (I can't remember which mission tho' but the
> >> >> >> > picture is in the public domain). While the lander(s) is(are)
> >> >> >> > too small to be seen directly, the fact that these objects
> >> >> >> > are where they should be seems to add a lot of credence to
> >> >> >> > the idea that the missions took place. Add that to the
> >> >> >> > photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
> >> >> >> > conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray,
> >> >> >> > you just have to look at it... *I've
>
> >> >> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
> >> >> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it so
> >> >> >> > you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
> >> >> >> > gray surface..
>
> >> >> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>
> >> >> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar
> >> >> >> landings. What they did is easier than a cover up would be
> >> >> >> anyway... I haven't got the patience to address the same BS
> >> >> >> issues like the shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in the
> >> >> >> flag and all that. it doesn't matter to them how well you
> >> >> >> explain it, they keep coming back for more.
>
> >> >> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>
> >> >> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
> >> >> _touchdown_photos
> >> >> > _010427.html
>
> >> >> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
> >> >> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>
> >> >> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>
> >> > Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>
> >> > Cheers
>
> >> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>
> > Well I looked for you and guess what, I had no idea they had made a
> > DVD about you: "The naked bunyip" Described as "The first serious
> > study of sex in Australia".
>
> > The best thing is there's no sex in it...
>
> Are you serious?
>
> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was "Brace
> yourself Sheila"


Oops a typo don't you mean "Bruce yourself Sheila"

LOL

Cheers

WingFlaps > wrote in
:

> On Jan 17, 3:53*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> WingFlaps > wrote
>> innews:da86374e-021d-4ecd-8d9a-fc15a
> :
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 16, 3:41*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> innews:0948547e-acea-4531-bd59-345e8
>> > :
>>
>> >> > On Jan 16, 2:50*pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> innews:93a2f48b-2dee-428b-bd42-32333
>> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 14, 9:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:ab075785-35a1-4c24-b0c6-950b2
>> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Jan 14, 2:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> WingFlaps > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-a19b8
>> >> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Jan 10, 5:07*am, BradGuth >
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> > news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
>> >> >> >> >> >> > :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > of everything NASA,
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Apollo, moon landing and hoax worthy as fast as
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > they can?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > with instead loads of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > smut
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > crapolla?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Is there a little something to worry about,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > especially since thus
>> >> >> >> >> >> > far
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > on behalf of anything
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax"
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > together: "(Venus
>> >> >> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > ahoax.)"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > ****ology that's hard at
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > work.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > storage units or archiving nodes, that's spying
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > and recording upon most everything in sight or out
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > of sight, yet somehow their having lost track of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > all 700 of those essential NASA/Apollo boxes of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > audio, video and endless streams of their mission
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > critical and science data. * Gee whiz, no wonder
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > our government can so continually lie, deny and
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > manage to get away with it, just like it did for
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > can manage to provoke the living crapolla out of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > those other mostly innocent Muslims.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > shame.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow, that was almost coherent.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Almost.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything
>> >> >> >> >> >> NASA/Apollo?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough,
>> >> >> >> >> >> bright enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of
>> >> >> >> >> >> that physically dark and electrostatic dusty moon.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually
>> >> >> >> >> >> rather nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much
>> >> >> >> >> >> of anything, even if given in full and uncorrected
>> >> >> >> >> >> color looking as though bluish as most everything
>> >> >> >> >> >> should. *Guess our moon landings were simply
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the
>> >> >> >> >> >> extent we've been informed. - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Actually there are at least two objects on the moon
>> >> >> >> >> > placed by apollo missions that can be detected on earth
>> >> >> >> >> > or by orbiting telescope. But that would get in the way
>> >> >> >> >> > of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand on them.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > 6574178373
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second
>> >> >> >> > is a dust 'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by
>> >> >> >> > the lander engines (I can't remember which mission tho'
>> >> >> >> > but the picture is in the public domain). While the
>> >> >> >> > lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen directly, the fact
>> >> >> >> > that these objects are where they should be seems to add a
>> >> >> >> > lot of credence to the idea that the missions took place.
>> >> >> >> > Add that to the photographs and samples and it's not
>> >> >> >> > looking good for the conspiracy theorists. As for the moon
>> >> >> >> > not being mostly gray, you just have to look at it...
>> >> >> >> > *I've
>>
>> >> >> >> > carried out image processing on my moon pictures and the
>> >> >> >> > saturation of the colors is not zero but very close to it
>> >> >> >> > so you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in
>> >> >> >> > the gray surface..
>>
>> >> >> >> Oh yeah. I didn't reckon you could see them with binoculars!
>>
>> >> >> >> I need no evidence whatsoever to "believe" in the lunar
>> >> >> >> landings. What they did is easier than a cover up would be
>> >> >> >> anyway... I haven't got the patience to address the same BS
>> >> >> >> issues like the shadows, the gamma radiation the breeze in
>> >> >> >> the flag and all that. it doesn't matter to them how well
>> >> >> >> you explain it, they keep coming back for more.
>>
>> >> >> > Hey Bertie what do you think about this:
>>
>> >> >> >http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15
>> >> >> _touchdown_photos
>> >> >> > _010427.html
>>
>> >> >> > Now I wonder how they thought to fake that? I wonder, can a
>> >> >> > flounder's brain explode or will it implode?
>>
>> >> >> That's cool. I'd sell any part of my body to have done that.
>>
>> >> > Yikes! You're assuming there would be a buyer... :-P
>>
>> >> > Cheers
>>
>> >> Have you ever realy looked around Ebay?
>>
>> > Well I looked for you and guess what, I had no idea they had made a
>> > DVD about you: "The naked bunyip" Described as "The first serious
>> > study of sex in Australia".
>>
>> > The best thing is there's no sex in it...
>>
>> Are you serious?
>>
>> In any case, I thought the first serious study of sex in Oz was
>> "Brace yourself Sheila"
>
>
> Oops a typo don't you mean "Bruce yourself Sheila"
>

Oh no! Another punster.

Bertie

Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?

Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
its knees.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
:

> Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?
>


Personally, I think you should.

> Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
> damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
> pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
> its knees.


Vive la revolution!


Bertie

On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
> :
>
> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?
>
> Personally, I think you should.
>
> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
> > its knees.
>
> Vive la revolution!

That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to the
topic at hand.

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
:

> On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
>> :
>>
>> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?
>>
>> Personally, I think you should.
>>
>> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
>> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
>> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
>> > its knees.
>>
>> Vive la revolution!
>
> That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to the
> topic at hand.
>

What topic is that?


Bertie

On Jan 20, 1:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote in news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
> :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> BradGuth > wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
> >> :
>
> >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?
>
> >> Personally, I think you should.
>
> >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
> >> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
> >> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
> >> > its knees.
>
> >> Vive la revolution!
>
> > That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to the
> > topic at hand.
>
> What topic is that?
>

Ace Ventura.

--
Slipped Moebius
mhm28x9

On Jan 20, 1:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote in news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
> :
>
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> BradGuth > wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
> >> :
>
> >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?
>
> >> Personally, I think you should.
>
> >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
> >> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
> >> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
> >> > its knees.
>
> >> Vive la revolution!
>
> > That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to the
> > topic at hand.
>
> What topic is that?
>
> Bertie

Whatever happened to your original "Awesome moonscape" topic?

Is there a little something you spooks and moles of MI5/CIA have to
say?

Are you folks into hiding the original topic along with hiding those
WMD?
- Brad Guth

On Jan 20, 6:10 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
> On Jan 20, 1:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>
>
>
> > BradGuth > wrote in news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
> > :
>
> > > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > >> BradGuth > wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
> > >> :
>
> > >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?
>
> > >> Personally, I think you should.
>
> > >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
> > >> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
> > >> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
> > >> > its knees.
>
> > >> Vive la revolution!
>
> > > That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to the
> > > topic at hand.
>
> > What topic is that?
>
> > Bertie
>
> Whatever happened to your original "Awesome moonscape" topic?
>
> Is there a little something you spooks and moles of MI5/CIA have to
> say?
>
> Are you folks into hiding the original topic along with hiding those
> WMD?
> - Brad Guth

That's odd, the Usenet lights went out with the last "Bertie the
Bunyip" reply on top of the Google/NOVA Usenet stack. Anyone got a
reason for that?

Our new and improved NASA, that for the past 8 years and counting as
having ignored all things Venus, is about to fold once again before
their own dumbfounded eyes of denial and evidence exclusion, in much
the same as our old NASA/Apollo fiasco that for some odd reasons still
can't be imaged from the best efforts of JAXA's Selene (KAGUYA) as
offering its 3D imaging that's offering more than sufficient 10 meters/
pixel resolution, as though our supposed "right stuff" is having to
continually hide under most any available moon rock because, there's
still nothing of any such bright and shiny Apollo technology residing
upon that physically dark as coal moon of ours (unless an artificial
crater counts).

- Brad Guth